TA 115 (Lothane)


Commentary 3



by Maurice McCarthy

27 June 2009, posted 4 July 2009




Lothane’s riposte is received with all the good grace in which it was given. I sincerely regret the tone of colloquial flippancy in my words.  For what it is worth, I have also received private communications concerning the matter.  Thank you for the correction over the word ‘psyche’. Certainly I did not intend to imply that TA115 spoke /against/ science. Worst of all I have offended a good man making an honest endeavour – and that really upset me.


On reflection, an operational definition of spirit is a very good place to start. Is it not akin to defining a force by the work that it does?




Maurice McCarthy

     e-mail<moss (at) mythic-beasts.com>