TA 105 (Vimal & Davia)


Response 1 (to Oliver, C1)




by Ram Lakhan Pandey Vimal

7 February 2008, posted 16 February 2008



Re <1>

RLPV: The term ‘emerges’ needs unpacking, this is done in TA103 and 104.


Re <2>

RLPV: I am glad that the term ‘bhutatma’ used in TA104 might be consistent with YS 3.17.


Re <3>

RLPV: By SQ, do you mean sub-quantum ?  Please see below in <5>.


Re <4>

RLPV:  Kindly elaborate your framework, especially non-physical ‘space’.  In PE-SE framework, matter is the carrier of  PEs/SEs.


Re <5>

RLPV: Bohm was influenced by eastern perspective to some extent, especially with Jiddu Krishnamurti (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Bohm).  I agree with you to some extent.  It would be productive and interesting to collaborate on this topic.  You know yoga-sutra more in deep than I do.


Let us try to integrate

constructivism-framework (Muller's TA45:  http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/articles/3.1.030.muller.pdf ,

PE-SE framework (TE102-105),

De and Pal's vedantic Universal-mind framework (TA81-82),

and Patanjali's yoga-sutra.




Ram Lakhan Pandey Vimal

     e-mail <<rlpvimal (at) yahoo.co.in>, <rvimal (at) mclean.harvard.edu>

URLs: <http://www.geocities.com/rlpvimal/>, <http://www.geocities.com/vri98/>, <http://www.geocities.com/das00m/>